Evaluation of Implants Placed Immediately or Delayed Into Extraction Sites
This study is currently recruiting patients
Verified by National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) September 2006
|Sponsors and Collaborators:
||National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
|Information provided by:
||National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
The purpose of this study is to determine the difference in success when placing implants immediately into an extraction site compared to delaying the implant placement until the extraction site has healed. In addition, the level of bone around the implants will be compared to determine if one method leads to better results over time.
||Procedure: Dental Implant
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Educational/Counseling/Training, Randomized, Single Blind, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Official Title: Prospective Evaluation of Immediate Temporized Implants
Further study details as provided by National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR):
Primary Outcomes: Crestal bone levels adjacent to the implants
Secondary Outcomes: Position of the papillary complex and facial gingival margin, and indicator of the inflammatory state of the perimplant tissues.
Expected Total Enrollment:
Study start: November 2003;
Expected completion: May 2008
Last follow-up: May 2008;
Data entry closure: May 2008
This revised application is a clinical trial designed to evaluate crestal bone level changes when implants are placed into
extraction sites and immediately provisionalized. Extraction of maxillary incisor teeth is a common procedure as documented
in our school clinics. Traditional treatment when a tooth is extracted includes a period of healing followed by placement
of an implant. Our preliminary data indicates that the delayed approach results in labial bone loss with resultant horizontal
deficiency in over 50% of cases, requiring hard and soft tissue grafting to achieve a functional result. Additional preliminary
data indicates that grafting the extraction site and/or immediate implant placement and provisionalization results in a functional
restoration, without the need for additional adjunctive grafting procedures. It is unclear how the crestal bone levels change
during healing of the extraction site prior to implant placement, in contrast to immediate implant placement, with immediate
provisionalization with a crown. We hypothesize that there will be differences in the crestal bone levels (primary endpoint),
and differences in soft tissue levels and indices (secondary endpoints) between implants immediately temporized, placed either
delayed or immediately after tooth extraction, with more bone loss in the immediate placement group (experimental) compared
to the delayed placement group (control). The long-term goal is to determine if the crestal bone remodeling after tooth extraction
or the apical position of the implant determines the final level of the crestal bone. Two groups of 45 patients will be evaluated.
All subjects will have a single rooted maxillary tooth extracted. One group will have the socket grafted with mineralized
bone and allowed four months prior to implant placement. The crestal bone in this group will have remodeled during the four
months of healing prior to implant placement. The second group will have the implant placed immediately after tooth extraction,
thus the crestal bone will remodel in the presence of the implant and the immediately placed temporary restoration, as a one-stage
procedure. For both groups, the implants will be immediately temporized with a crown after implant placement. Standardized
hard and soft tissue data will be collected pre-extraction as baseline, and then prospectively for at least two years in this
trial, to compare the methods and contrast the effectiveness of the proposed immediate restoration therapy.
Ages Eligible for Study:
Genders Eligible for Study:
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- All patients will be willing to be present for examination two times a year for at least three years, as well as maintenance
cleanings twice a year 3 months prior to the data collection visit.
- All patients will be free of uncontrolled diabetes (any type), existing malignancy, and will not be receiving any therapy
that suppresses their immune system, such as radiation, chemotherapy, or chronic steroid usage
- Need for extraction of a single rooted maxillary central or lateral incisor, canine, or premolar, with no signs of acute infection
(purulent exudate, erythema, pain, and swelling).
- Patients will have bone present on all surfaces of the tooth within 3 mm of the gingival margin of the planned restoration,
in order to provide sufficient bone to circumferentially cover the implant.
- All patients will have adequate space for satisfactory restoration of the edentulous space.
- Each patient's dentition will be free of active periodontal disease or exhibit controllable periodontal disease such that
their teeth will clinically be non-mobile and have probing depths less than 3 mm.
- All prospective sites will have at least 2mm of attached or keratinized gingiva.
- The crestal bone width should be enough to accommodate either a 3.75 diameter implant for the central incisor, canine, and
premolar sites, or a 3.25 mm diameter implant for the lateral incisor tooth sites. Bone height should be at least 14 mm for
accommodation of the implant.
- Patients with labial dehiscence defects greater than 3 mm from the proposed gingival margin of the planned restoration will
be excluded from this study.
- Patients who cannot come for follow up due to conflicts of schedules will not be accepted into the study.
- Patients with advanced cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, liver disease that place them in an ASA III or IV rating will be
excluded. Post-menopausal women with known osteoporosis as determined by their medical internist, will be excluded. Patients
with known alcohol abuse will be excluded.
Please refer to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov identifier
LSU School of Dentistry, New Orleans,
United States; Recruiting
Michael S Block, DMD
Michael S Block, DMD, Principal Investigator
Study chairs or principal investigators
Michael S Block, DMD, Ph.D, Principal Investigator, LSU School of Dentistry
Study ID Numbers:
September 14, 2006
Record first received:
August 15, 2003
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on 2006-09-29